Among other things, plaintiffs will present evidence that the agency, which ranks among the nation's worst in insuring children are placed in safe and stable foster placements, routinely fails to follow its own policies or meet its performance targets.
Reports issued by independent experts have documented agency deficiencies, including;
- failing to meet with foster children monthly or to insure that placements are safe and stable;
- inadequately monitoring, supervising, and assessing the performance of private child placement agencies or group homes to which it sends approximately 60% of the children in its care;
- shuffling children among foster homes at extremely high rates;
- failing to give priority to finding permanent homes for foster children;
- failing to prevent children who they have returned home from being subjected to further abuse and neglect; and
- overprescribing psychotropic medication and failing to monitor its effects.
It is unusual for class actions raising these claims to go to trial. Most often they end by agreement of the parties and a court's entry of a complex consent agreement. For example, Connecticut's child welfare agency has been struggling unsuccessfully to comply with the Juan F. consent decree for several decades.