September 26, 2014

Washington Supreme Court Holds State Legislature in Contempt on Education Funding

The Washington State Supreme Court is holding the state legislature in contempt of court for failing to make enough progress toward meeting the education funding goals set by the court in an earlier case. The Seattle Times reports the September 11 decision gives the legislature until the end of the 2015 legislative session to do better, and the court promises to consider sanctions against the legislature if the progress is inadequate.

In the decision, the court promises to revisit the issue next year. “If by the adjournment of the 2015 legislative session the state has not purged the contempt by complying with the court’s order, the court will reconvene to impose sanctions and other remedial measures as necessary,” the decision states. At issue is whether the state has made enough progress toward fully funding education as required by the court in its landmark 2012 decision in McCleary v. State of Washington.

At the contempt hearing earlier in September, the justices were publicly mulling over steps they could take to generate billions more in education dollars. The Seattle Post Intelligencer reported that the judges expressed impatience with the state legislature’s efforts to meet the court’s demands in McCleary.

To create more state revenue for education, Justice Charles Johnson offered the suggestion that the justices could declare every state tax exemption unconstitutional, according to the Intelligencer. He estimated that this could increase state revenue by $30 billion, which he said was more than enough to pay for basic education for the state’s public school children. The state’s solicitor general responded that such a move would be efficient, but probably not constitutional, according to the article.

Washington is not the only state wrestling with a school finance lawsuit. As of last December, the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) identified nine states (including Connecticut) in the midst of litigation challenging state school financing systems.