- who is unable to provide proper identification;
- whose name does not appear on the official registry list; or
- whose eligibility to vote is challenged.
Provisional Ballots: the Next Hanging Chad?
Top 10 Consumer Complaints
More: General LawPizza Boxes: They’re Not Always Recyclable
Hot Report: Online Purchase of Ammunition
More: Office of Legislative Research, Public SafetyOLR Report 2012-R-0390 explains (1) whether state or federal law prohibits online ammunition sales or purchases and (2) what, if any, eligibility criteria companies that sell ammunition online post on their websites for buyers and what checks they have in place to ensure that buyers meet the criteria.
Neither state nor federal law prohibits online ammunition sales or purchases. Several companies currently sell ammunition online.
Some companies post eligibility criteria for, and restrictions on, online ammunition purchases; others do not. Typically, those that post this information require purchasers to meet federal criteria for purchasing ammunition, which are the same as for firearm purchases. They require buyers to submit proof of age and “affirm” or “confirm” that they meet the criteria. The websites do not specify any other steps, if any, the companies take to verify that buyers are eligible.
For more information, read the full report.
UConn, Yale Rate Among the Nation’s Greenest Campuses
More: Environment, Higher EducationStudy Shows Childhood Cholesterol Lower, Obesity the Same
Do You Want to Create Jobs, Stimulate Private Investment, and Boost Productivity? Repave Your Roads...
More: Commerce, Transportation“Bank on Connecticut” Pilot Programs Will Help Residents Without Bank Accounts
Hot Report: OLR Backgrounder: Evolution of Model Policy for Police Responses to Family Violence Crimes
More: Children, Office of Legislative Research, Public SafetyOLR Report 2012-R-0375 summarizes the state's efforts to establish a statewide police officer response policy for officers to follow in all cases involving family violence or related protective order violations. The goal of the policy is to ensure that family violence laws are enforced evenhandedly throughout the state.
A 1986 state law requires the State Police and local police departments to develop and implement operational guidelines for making arrests for family violence offenses. These are offenses that, in addition to their other elements (1) victimize family or other household members and (2) involve actual or credible threats of physical harm. The statute specifies general areas the guidelines must cover, but individual police departments otherwise have discretion in designing and implementing them and departments are under no obligation to review or update them.
Although not required by law, the Police Officer Standards and Training Council (POST), which is responsible for training local police officers, developed a model family violence response policy in 1991 to train police officers and help departments draw up their guidelines. But departments do not have to adopt this model policy and not all have done so.
Concerned about the lack of uniformity in police responses to family violence incidents, the legislature in 2011 created a task force to evaluate existing policies and procedures and develop a model policy and implementation plan. In February 2012, the task force submitted its model policy along with recommendations for further study. The policy is based on POST's 2006 model policy and covers (1) model policy and dual arrests, (2) training and data collection, and (3) protective orders and bail bonds. (We have not included information on the protective order and bail bond recommendations, as those are directed at the Judicial Branch rather than law enforcement.)
The Judiciary Committee incorporated the task force policy into HB 5548, which passed unanimously in both chambers. It also established the Family Violence Model Policy Governing Council to review and update the policy as needed. The task force policy becomes law October 1, 2012, unless the council adopts one that supersedes it.
For more information, read the full report.
USDA Imposing Tougher Sanctions on Food Stamp Retailers Who Defraud the Program but Allows More Flexibility for Minor Violations
More: Human ServicesNumber of Wiretaps Decreases Nationwide
Is Cyberbullying Overhyped?
More: EducationArizona Changes State Employees to “At Will”
Twenty-Three Connecticut Hospitals Face Medicare Penalties for High Readmission Rates
More: Aging, Public HealthHot Report: Penalties for Illegal Handgun Possession
OLR Report 2012-R-0345 summarizes the criminal penalties in all states and the District of Columbia for illegal possession of handguns (pistols and revolvers), including the class of the crime, sentence range, and whether there is a mandatory minimum sentence.
States restrict handgun possession in a variety of contexts. For example, following federal law, most states restrict access to handguns by minors; people convicted of felonies or certain other crimes; and people with certain mental health adjudications. Some states also require a permit, license, or certificate for handgun possession. While the 2nd Amendment to the Federal Constitution protects the individual right to own firearms, that right is not unlimited, and can be subject to certain gun control laws (D.C. vs. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008); McDonald vs. Chicago, 130 S.Ct. 3020 (2010) (applying Heller to states)).
Penalties for illegal possession of handguns vary widely across states. For example, state law penalties for possession by convicted felons range from misdemeanors to felonies with mandatory minimums. Penalties for felons' illegal gun possession are generally higher than penalties for illegal possession in other contexts (such as possession without a required permit).
The report described penalties for illegal handgun possession in three contexts: (1) possession without a permit, license, or certificate in those states with such a requirement; (2) possession by minors; and (3) possession by convicted felons.
For more information, read the full report.
Air Quality Around Schools
More: Environment“Docs v. Glocks”
Where was the Mystic Whaler?
More: TransportationWho Are the Uninsured Adults?
Hot Report: State Sales Tax
More: Finance, Office of Legislative ResearchOLR Report 2012-R-0357 explains (1) many states impose a sales tax and (2) Connecticut's sales tax compares to other states.
The District of Columbia and all but five states (Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon) impose a state sales tax, ranging from 2.9% in Colorado to 7.25% in California. Connecticut imposes a 6.35% sales tax, which ranks as the 11th highest state sales tax rate.
At least two factors complicate comparisons of sales tax rates across states. The first is that many states allow counties and municipalities to levy sales taxes. Thus, the rates in these states vary across localities and, in some cases, the combined state and local rates are substantially higher than the state's base sales tax rate. When Connecticut is compared with other states based on combined state and local rates, its rank drops from 11th to 31st.
The other factor is that states levy the tax on different mixes of goods and services. Some states tax a broad range of goods and services, with few exemptions, while others tax relatively few. Connecticut's sales tax base is broader than that of surrounding states, but by one recent estimate, it is narrower than most states' sales taxes when taking into account its impact on the state's economic activity. A March 2012 State Tax Notes report estimates that 26.19% of Connecticut personal income is spent on goods and services subject to the state's sales tax, compared to the national median of 34.5% (Mikesell, John. “The Disappearing Retail Sales Tax,” State Tax Notes, March 5, 2012, pgs. 777-791).
While sales taxes across states differ widely, both in their rates and bases, they share several common features. In general, state sales taxes apply to all retail purchases of tangible personal property, except for those explicitly exempted, but only to specified services. States rely on vendors to consider the nature of the purchase, how it will be used, and the nature of the purchaser in determining the taxability of transactions. And all states that impose a sales tax also impose a use tax on taxable goods and services purchased in other jurisdictions for use in the home state.
For more information, read the full report.
ABA Task Force on Legal Education
More: Higher Education, JudiciaryNTSB Provides Recommendations from Air Show Crash Investigation
Health Care Exchanges Explained
More: Insurance and Real EstateNew FDA Food Safety Rules Delayed
From Owning to Renting
More: HousingWhat Will the Expiration of Bush-Era Tax Cuts Mean to You?
Emerald Ash Borer Found in Connecticut
More: EnvironmentTown vs. State Over ‘Fracking’ Regulations
Economic Development Policy’s Outer Limits
More: CommerceHot Report: Criminal Background Checks for Non-School-Sponsored Sports Coaches
OLR Report 2012-R-0359 explains (1) if Connecticut law requires background checks for nonschool-sponsored sports program coaches and volunteers, (2) whether any other states or any national youth sports leagues require such checks, and (3) for information on any recent Connecticut proposals to require non-school-sponsored youth sports coaches and volunteers to undergo background checks. This report is an update of OLR 2004-R-0615.
Criminal Background Checks for Non-School-Sponsored Sports Coaches
Connecticut law does not require criminal records background checks of school volunteers or nonschool-sponsored sports coaches.
We found three states with laws on criminal background checks for non-school youth sports organization personnel. Two of the states, New Jersey and Oregon, expressly encourage or allow the checks. Florida's background checks are mandatory.
Several youth sports leagues, including Little League Baseball and Pop Warner Leagues, require annual background checks for all league employees and volunteers. The national leagues require local leagues to check the names of their volunteers against their state sex offender registry.
Since 2004, three bills were introduced to extend the law on sports-related criminal background checks to nonschool employees and volunteers. None became law.
For more information, read the full report.
Primary Day
More: Government Admin. and ElectionsBankruptcy Filings Falling
According to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, bankruptcy filings for the 12-month period ending March 31, 2012 fell 13% percent compared to the prior 12-months. Filings fell from 1,571,183 to 1,367,006 nationwide.
Nonbusiness (i.e., personal) filings were also down 13% while business bankruptcy filings were down 14%. With 1,320,613 bankruptcy filings for the 12-month period ending March 31, 2012, that's the lowest level since 2009.
Beware of Utility Credit Scammers
More: General LawNew Orleans’ “Sophie’s Choice”
“You have a choice,” said David Gilmore, the private contractor the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development hired to oversee the New Orleans Public Housing Authority: “Do you serve 800 families in deplorable conditions or 300 in much better conditions?” Gilmore added, “I know what choice I would make.” Do you know what choice you would make?
Appeals Court Rejects Ruling on U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Handling of Its Mental Health Care System
More: Veterans' AffairsThe article states, “[i]n a 10-1 decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a lawsuit that sought to force the Department of Veterans Affairs to overhaul the treatment program and reversed an earlier ruling that would have forced the government to speed up treatment requests and benefit claims.”
It goes on to say that , “the decision came in a lawsuit filed in 2007 by a veterans’ group that alleged the VA’s system could be blamed for suicides and other suffering because of its slow approach to treating returning soldiers.”
Writing for the court, Judge Jay Bybee stated “[The lawsuit] sounds a plaintive cry for help, but it has been misdirected to us.”
Study: Many Children Not Restrained When Riding in Cars
Using Landlords to Strike at Medical Marijuana Retailers
More: JudiciaryHot Report: Death Penalty
OLR Report 2012-R-0321 describes which states abolished the death penalty and how they did so, which countries have the death penalty, and the history of the death penalty in Connecticut.
- In 2007, New Jersey abolished the death penalty and legislatively resentenced death row inmates to life in prison without parole.
- In 2009, New Mexico abolished the death penalty prospectively, leaving two people on death row.
- In 2011, Illinois' legislature abolished the death penalty prospectively but the governor commuted the sentences of those on death row to life in prison without parole.
- In 2012, Connecticut abolished the death penalty prospectively, 10 inmates sentenced to death remain on death row, and anyone who committed a crime before April 25, 2012 can be charged with a capital felony and sentenced to death (PA 12-5).
- 97 countries have completely abolished the death penalty;
- 57 countries, including the United States, allow it;
- 36 countries allow it but in practice do not carry out the death penalty; and
- 8 countries only allow the death penalty in exceptional circumstances.
- In 2007, New Jersey abolished the death penalty and legislatively resentenced death row inmates to life in prison without parole.
- In 2009, New Mexico abolished the death penalty prospectively, leaving two people on death row.
- In 2011, Illinois' legislature abolished the death penalty prospectively but the governor commuted the sentences of those on death row to life in prison without parole.
- In 2012, Connecticut abolished the death penalty prospectively, 10 inmates sentenced to death remain on death row, and anyone who committed a crime before April 25, 2012 can be charged with a capital felony and sentenced to death (PA 12-5).
- 97 countries have completely abolished the death penalty;
- 57 countries, including the United States, allow it;
- 36 countries allow it but in practice do not carry out the death penalty; and
- 8 countries only allow the death penalty in exceptional circumstances.
New Report Highlights Issues with Private Student Loans
More: Higher EducationWhen You Have to Drop a Dime on Your Own Employee
If you are in business long enough the chances a pretty good that one day you will discover that one of your employees has done something not just stupid, but possibly criminal.
The Connecticut Employment Law blog recently considered the subject of when an employer should report a crime by an employee. The Penn State child abuse scandal has brought this issue to light in stark terms.
Blogger Daniel Schwartz reminds us that some employers are, by law, mandated reporters for certain types of crimes. Other situations may fall in more of a gray area.
Schwartz cautions that employers should take seriously situations that suggest criminal activity – even if it is by your top salesman or a legendary football program.
Hot Report: Federal and State Law on Cable TV Competition
More: Energy and Technology, Office of Legislative ResearchOLR Report 2012-R-0356 explains federal and state law on cable TV competition, specifically whether they permit more than one cable company to serve an area.
Urban Farms: A New Use for Vacant and Blighted Property
More: Environment, Planning and DevelopmentNCSL Website Tracks State Legislative Responses to Federal Health Reform
Calculating a Superhero’s Income Tax Liability
More: FinanceDesigning Elections to Protect Votes
A new Brennan Center report examines how design flaws in ballots, voting machines, and voter instructions led to thousands of lost votes in the 2008 and 2010 elections. The authors contend that technology (e.g., smartphones and computer tablets) has prompted large segments of the private and public sectors to employ design and usability research to improve customers’ ability to use their products. Yet within elections, progress has been slow, resulting in too many design defects. The report recommends that election officials take the following measures to cure these defects and protect votes in 2012:
- review lost vote data,
- create a checklist of design best practices,
- conduct usability testing, and
- make voters aware of potential problems.
- ballot design checklist,
- primer on how ballots are commonly lost (e.g., overvotes and undervotes), and
- summary of common design and usability issues in 2008 and 2010.